WHO Poll
Q: 2023/24 Hopes & aspirations for this season
a. As Champions of Europe there's no reason we shouldn't be pushing for a top 7 spot & a run in the Cups
24%
  
b. Last season was a trophy winning one and there's only one way to go after that, I expect a dull mid table bore fest of a season
17%
  
c. Buy some f***ing players or we're in a battle to stay up & that's as good as it gets
18%
  
d. Moyes out
38%
  
e. New season you say, woohoo time to get the new kit and wear it it to the pub for all the big games, the wags down there call me Mr West Ham
3%
  



Northern Sold 2:27 Thu Feb 2
Re: players ratings city
Jimbo... it's built on radio active sludge... where the fuck you been for the past 4 or 5 years... you could not get anymore Cesspit'y than being built on radioactive sludge...

jimbo2. 2:24 Thu Feb 2
Re: players ratings city
It's not a cesspit Northern! How many times have you been there?

Northern Sold 2:21 Thu Feb 2
Re: players ratings city
They may well have beaten us at the Boleyn... but I know one thing the stats say they would not have smashed 4 and 5 past us... because they never did in the 100 odd years we was there same re Arsenal... they never put 5 past us at UP... and Watford scoring 4?? Yeah alright... nothing to do with the cess pit... keep reading that Martin Samuels article and keep nodding...

Rivs 2:21 Thu Feb 2
Re: players ratings city
clarky 1:59 Thu Feb 2

jimbo2. 2:18 Thu Feb 2
Re: players ratings city
Reid, Antonio & Carroll can be satisfied with their individual contributions & Randolph had very little chance with any of their goals. Snodgrass looked decent when he came on & that coincided with our only "decent" period of the game, outside the first 10-15 mins. The other players all fell between poor & woeful! Thank God we don't have to play MC again this season, as we are miles behind them! Other comments are right, it's becoming very boring for some posters total obsession that all our problems are down to the stadium & pitch size, they aren't, so please try to grow up. Also the London stadium is not a cesspit, that is a dumb & ludicrous claim, often from people who have never even been there!

Robson 2:01 Thu Feb 2
Re: players ratings city
If Randolph is blameless for the goals why only 5?

1964 2:00 Thu Feb 2
Re: players ratings city
The stadium is currently shit but it's not the reason we lost to City 4-0..

clarky 1:59 Thu Feb 2
Re: players ratings city
Yeah they would've tonked us at Upton Park as well
Blaming the stadium every time we lose is getting a bit dull!

El Scorchio 1:47 Thu Feb 2
Re: players ratings city
Snodders looked decent when he came on.

If he was fit to start he'd have offered a lot more protection down our right hand side. Feghouli isn't that interested in tracking back and working hard without the ball.

jimbo2. 1:44 Thu Feb 2
Re: players ratings city
Stewie we were beaten by a much better team, who were on fire, not the stadium!

clarky 1:39 Thu Feb 2
Re: players ratings city
A collective 3

stewie griffin 12:27 Thu Feb 2
Re: players ratings city
LONDON STADIUM - 0

1964 12:25 Thu Feb 2
Re: players ratings city
Only players that came out with any credit were Reid and Carroll both 6.

Antonio in fits and starts but even he was dissappointing - 5

The rest? I'd score them a FAT 0





Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: